Profile of Helicobacter pylori infections among children in the South Island of New Zealand (2010–2021)

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHelicobacter pylori is a gram‐negative gut bacterium most often acquired during childhood. International guidelines state that children with suspected H. pylori infection should be referred to a gastroenterologist for investigation via gastroscopy and biopsy. Eradication therapy should be prescribed for children with peptic ulcer disease or following a treatment risk/benefit discussion for those with an incidental gastroscopy finding. Guidelines state that for children a “test‐and‐treat” approach is not warranted, contrasting recommendations for adults. The aim of this study was to profile pediatric H. pylori infections in the South Island of New Zealand (NZ) to determine diagnostic and management strategies, and adherence to international guidelines.Materials and MethodsRetrospective data for positive H. pylori tests between 2010 and 2021 were retrieved from hospitals and regional testing laboratories throughout the South Island (NZ) for children ≤18 years. Outcome data were retrieved from tertiary care hospital records; sociodemographic, testing methods, eradication therapy, and symptoms.ResultsTwo‐hundred and forty children were identified: 105 (44%) male, mean age 13.2 years (SD 4.3). Participants of Pasifika, Asian, and Middle Eastern/Latin American/African heritage were overrepresented compared to the NZ census data. Overall, 138 (58%) children were diagnosed via stool antigen tests, 78 (32%) serum, and only 24 (10%) adhered to international guidelines in being confirmed via gastroscopy. Only 59 (25%) had a record of eradication therapy, and 39/59 (66%) were retested to determine eradication success, with 32 (82%) negative tests and seven (18%) remaining positive. Of the 181 (75%) that had eradication status unknown, 66 (28%) had a retest result available with 48 (73%) testing negative and 18 (27%) positive, suggesting a substantial proportion had received eradication therapy without adhering to international guidelines.ConclusionsInternational guidelines were not adhered to for most children in the study cohort. Implications of this include cost, unnecessary venipuncture, and unjustified antibiotic exposure.