Do I care for you more when you really need help? An experimental test of the effect of clinical urgency on compassion in health care

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo experimentally investigate whether more urgent patient presentations elicit greater compassion from health care professionals than less urgent, facilitating future research and thinking to address systemic barriers to compassion in health care.DesignThis is a pre‐registered online study with an experimental, within‐subjects repeated‐measure study design. Two clinical vignettes that systematically varied the urgency of patient presentation were utilized. Both vignettes depicted a patient with difficult behaviours typically associated with lower compassion.MethodsHealth care professionals (doctors, nurses and allied health practitioners) recruited from all 20 District Health Boards across Aotearoa/New Zealand completed two vignettes in a counterbalanced order. Paired‐sample t‐tests were used to test the effect of the presentation urgency on indices of compassion.ResultsA total of 939 participants completed the vignettes (20% doctors, 47%, nurses and 33% allied health professionals). As expected, participants reported greater care and motivation to help the more urgent patient. However, the more urgent patient was also perceived as less difficult, and exploratory analyses showed that perceived patient difficulty was associated with lower caring and motivation to help, particularly in the less urgent patient.ConclusionsThis is the first work to experimentally test the relationship between the urgency of patient presentation and compassion in health care. Although the association between urgency and difficulty is complex, our findings are consonant with evolutionary views in which urgent distress elicits greater compassion. A system‐wide orientation towards efficiency and urgency may exacerbate this ‘bias’ which must be addressed to ensure more equitable compassion in health care.