Exploring healthcare professionals' perspective of the process of obtaining consent for adult patient's having planned surgery: A scoping review

Author:

Gardiner Therese M.12ORCID,Gillespie Brigid M.123ORCID,Latimer Sharon12ORCID,Hewitt Jayne14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Griffith University Southport Queensland Australia

2. Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Southport Queensland Australia

3. NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Wiser Wound Care Menzies Health Institute Queensland Southport Queensland Australia

4. Griffith Law School Griffith University Southport Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimThe aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview of the literature about the process of obtaining consent from adult patients undergoing planned surgery from the healthcare professionals' perspective and analyse knowledge gaps.BackgroundThe process of obtaining consent for planned elective surgery manifests an individual's fundamental right to decide what happens to their body. The process is often suboptimal and problematic, placing a significant resource burden on health systems globally. Deficiencies in the documentation on consent forms have also been shown to increase the risk of operating room error.DesignScoping review.MethodsArksey and O′Malley's (International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 2005 and 19) five‐step scoping review methodology was used.ResultsFifty‐three articles were included; 39 primary and 14 secondary research publications. Three key findings were identified; there is currently low‐level evidence about surgical consent processes to inform clinical practice; junior doctors obtain surgical consent frequently, yet this process was likely undertaken sub‐optimally; and current knowledge gaps include capacity assessment, decision‐making and pre‐procedural consent checks.ConclusionPlanned surgical consent processes are complex, and both surgeons and perioperative nurses are essential during the process. While surgeons have responsibility to obtain consent, perioperative nurses provide a safety net in the surgical consent process checking the surgical consent information is correct and has been understood by the patient. Such actions may influence consent validity and patient safety in the operating room. Knowledge gaps about capacity assessment, decision‐making, pre‐procedural checks and the impact of junior doctors obtaining consent on patient understanding, safety and legal claims are evident.Relevance to clinical practiceThis review highlights the importance of the surgical nurse's role in the planned surgical consent process. While the responsibility for obtaining surgical consent lies with the surgeon, the nurse's role verifying consent information is crucial as they act as a safety net and can reduce error in the operating room.No patient or public contributionThe authors declare that no patient or public contribution was made to this review in accordance with the aim to map existing literature from the healthcare professionals' perspective.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3