Association of physical restraint duration and undesirable outcomes amongst inpatients comorbid with dementia and pneumonia in acute care settings

Author:

Okumura Yasuyuki1ORCID,Sakata Nobuo23,Ogawa Asao4

Affiliation:

1. Initiative for Clinical Epidemiological Research Tokyo Japan

2. Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine University of Tsukuba Ibaraki Japan

3. Department of Home Care Medicine Setagaya Memorial Hospital Tokyo Japan

4. Exploratory Oncology Research and Clinical Trial Center National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan

Abstract

AbstractAims and ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the association between physical restraint duration and undesirable outcomes amongst inpatients comorbid with dementia and pneumonia in acute care hospitals.BackgroundPhysical restraints are frequently used in the management of patients, especially amongst patients with dementia. No previous study investigated the potential undesirable effects of physical restraints in patients with dementia.MethodsThis was a cohort study using a nationwide discharge abstract database in Japan. Patients aged ≥65 years with dementia hospitalised for pneumonia or aspiration pneumonia between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2019 were identified. The exposure was physical restraint. The primary outcome was hospital discharge to the community. Secondary outcomes included hospitalisation costs, functional decline, in‐hospital mortality, and institutionalisation for long‐term care.ResultsA total of 18,255 inpatients with pneumonia and dementia in 307 hospitals were included in this study. Of them, 21.5% and 23.7% had physical restraint during full and partial days of hospital stays, respectively. Discharge to the community incidence rates was lower in the full‐restraint vs. the no‐restraint group (27 vs. 29 per 1000 person‐days; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01–1.10]) and the partial‐restraint vs. the no‐restraint group (17 vs. 29 per 1000 person‐days; HR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.71–1.87]). The risks of functional decline were higher in the full‐restraint vs. the no‐restraint group (27.8% vs. 20.8%; RR, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.22, 1.46]) and the partial‐restraint vs. the no‐restraint group (29.2% vs. 20.8%; RR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.29, 1.53]).ConclusionsThe use of physical restraints was associated with a lower incidence rate of discharge to the community and an increased risk of functional decline at discharge. Further research is needed to judge the benefit–risk balance of physical restraints in acute care settings.Relevance to Clinical PracticeUnderstanding the risk of physical restraints allows medical staff to improve the process of decision making in everyday practice.No Patient or Public Contribution.Reporting MethodsThe reporting of this article conforms to the STROBE statement.

Funder

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Physical Restraint Usage in Hospitals Across the United States: 2011-2019;Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes;2024-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3