Affiliation:
1. Texas Tech University of El Paso El Paso Texas USA
2. Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Chennai India
3. University of Milan Milan Italy
4. Cairo University Cairo Egypt
5. University of Texas El Paso El Paso Texas USA
6. Jazan University Jazan Saudi Arabia
7. Dentistry and Oral Health La Trobe University Bendigo Victoria Australia
Abstract
AbstractAimThe present systematic review with meta‐analysis aimed to investigate the global association between smokeless tobacco (SLT) use and periodontitis, considering significant effect size variation based on the income levels of countries.MethodsWe searched seven databases to identify studies that assessed the prevalence of periodontitis in adult SLT users compared to non‐users. The quality of studies was evaluated using the 10‐item risk‐of‐bias tool, and publication bias was addressed through the trim‐and‐fill method. Sensitivity analysis utilized the leave‐one‐out approach. Meta‐analysis and meta‐regression, stratified by country income, SLT type, and smoking status, employed robust variance estimation.ResultsFrom an initial pool of 484 studies, 29 studies met the selection criteria and were subjected to qualitative synthesis. Subsequently, data from 19 studies were included in the meta‐analysis. SLT users exhibited a nearly threefold greater likelihood of periodontitis compared to non‐users (OR = 2.99; 95% CI: 2.10, 4.27; p < .01). The pooled estimate did not vary significantly based on the type of SLT used or concurrent smoking. However, the odds of periodontitis varied according to the economic level of the country; the pooled estimate was higher in high‐income countries (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.37; p < .01) and even higher in lower‐middle‐income and lower‐income countries (OR = 3.91; 95% CI: 2.66, 5.77; p < .01).ConclusionsSmokeless tobacco users have a higher likelihood of developing periodontitis. This study underscores global disparities in the SLT–periodontitis relationship, highlighting the need for targeted interventions, particularly in economically challenged areas where SLT use is largely unregulated.