Development and validation of models for predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage: A multicenter cohort study

Author:

Chen Cheng1,Zhao Baihui12ORCID,Pan Jue1,Chen Lujiao2,Yang Xiaofu1,Lv Min1,Qiu Liping3,Yang Mengmeng1,Ying Xia1,Wang Minmin4,Wang Huanhuan5,Chen Xiuying2ORCID,Zhang Xiaoxing3,Weng Xiaofeng1,Luo Qiong1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine Hangzhou China

2. Department of Obstetrics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine Yiwu China

3. Huzhou Maternal & Child Health Care Hospital Huzhou China

4. The First People's Hospital of Fuyang Hangzhou China

5. Traditional Chinese Medicine of Changxing Huzhou China

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionEmergency cervical cerclage is a recognized method for preventing mid‐trimester pregnancy loss and premature birth; however, its benefits remain controversial. This study aimed to establish preoperative models predicting preterm birth and gestational latency following emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant patients with a high risk of preterm birth.Material and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data from patients who received emergency cerclage between 2015 and 2023 in three institutions. Patients were grouped into a derivation cohort (n = 141) and an independent validation cohort (n = 61). Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent predictive variables and establish the models. Harrell's C‐index, time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were performed to assess the models.ResultsThe models incorporated gestational weeks at cerclage placement, history of prior second‐trimester loss and/or preterm birth, cervical dilation, and preoperative C‐reactive protein level. The C‐index of the model for predicting preterm birth before 28 weeks was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82–0.93) in the derivation cohort and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.71–0.92) in the independent validation cohort; The C‐index of the model for predicting gestational latency was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66–0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71–0.84), respectively. In the derivation set, the areas under the curves were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.84 for predicting 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐week pregnancy prolongation, respectively. The corresponding values for the external validation were 0.78, 0.78, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration curves showed a good homogeneity between the observed and predicted ongoing pregnant probabilities. Decision curve analyses revealed satisfactory clinical usefulness.ConclusionsThese novel models provide reliable and valuable prognostic predictions for patients undergoing emergency cerclage. The models can assist clinicians and patients in making personalized clinical decisions before opting for the cervical cerclage.

Funder

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3