Affiliation:
1. Unit of Endodontology, Department of Restorative Dentistry UCL Eastman Dental Institute London UK
Abstract
AbstractSurgical endodontic treatment encompasses a broad spectrum of procedures, amongst which root‐end cavity preparation and filling, retrograde root canal treatment and through‐and‐through endodontic surgery, may be classified under the umbrella term ‘Root‐end surgery’. This narrative review considers the available data on periapical healing, soft tissue healing, tooth survival and oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), following root‐end surgery and the factors that affect its outcomes. The pooled periapical healed rate for the studies published up to 2021 was 69% (95% CI: 65%, 73%) but increased to 76% (95% CI: 66%, 86%) when only data from the 2020's studies were analysed. The prognostic factors consistently reported for periapical healing have included: pre‐operative periapical lesion with complete loss of buccal plate, quality of root‐end preparation, remaining thickness of apical root dentine and restorative status. Soft tissue healing of the reflected flap was found to have a positive association with periapical healing. The survival rates following root‐end surgery range from 48% to 93%, with failure of periapical healing associated with root and crown fracture, being the predominant reasons for tooth extraction. The factors influencing impact of root‐end surgery on patients' quality of life could not be adequately evaluated due to design flaws in the available studies. In conclusion, if root canal treatment failure due to leakage through cracks, fractures or restoration margin are excluded, the remaining cases may represent localized residual infection and inflammation at the periapex that should be amenable to predictable management with the aid of modern root‐end surgery.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献