Supporting the ‘lived expertise’ of older adults with type 1 diabetes: An applied focus group analysis to characterize barriers, facilitators, and strategies for self‐management in a growing and understudied population

Author:

Cristello Sarteau Angelica1ORCID,Muthukkumar Rashmi2,Smith Cambray3,Busby‐Whitehead Jan45,Lich Kristen Hassmiller3,Pratley Richard E.6,Thambuluru Sirisha7,Weinstein Joshua3,Weinstock Ruth S.8,Young Laura A.7,Kahkoska Anna R.157ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nutrition University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

2. School of Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. Department of Health Policy and Management University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

4. Division of Geriatric Medicine University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

5. UNC Center for Aging and Health University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

6. AdventHealth Translational Research Institute Orlando Florida USA

7. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

8. SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse New York USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThere is a growing number of older adults (≥65 years) who live with type 1 diabetes. We qualitatively explored experiences and perspectives regarding type 1 diabetes self‐management and treatment decisions among older adults, focusing on adopting care advances such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).MethodsAmong a clinic‐based sample of older adults ≥65 years with type 1 diabetes, we conducted a series of literature and expert informed focus groups with structured discussion activities. Groups were transcribed followed by inductive coding, theme identification, and inference verification. Medical records and surveys added clinical information.ResultsTwenty nine older adults (age 73.4 ± 4.5 years; 86% CGM users) and four caregivers (age 73.3 ± 2.9 years) participated. Participants were 58% female and 82% non‐Hispanic White. Analysis revealed themes related to attitudes, behaviours, and experiences, as well as interpersonal and contextual factors that shape self‐management and outcomes. These factors and their interactions drive variability in diabetes outcomes and optimal treatment strategies between individuals as well as within individuals over time (i.e. with ageing). Participants proposed strategies to address these factors: regular, holistic needs assessments to match people with effective self‐care approaches and adapt them over the lifespan; longitudinal support (e.g., education, tactical help, sharing and validating experiences); tailored education and skills training; and leveraging of caregivers, family, and peers as resources.ConclusionsOur study of what influences self‐management decisions and technology adoption among older adults with type 1 diabetes underscores the importance of ongoing assessments to address dynamic age‐specific needs, as well as individualized multi‐faceted support that integrates peers and caregivers.

Funder

Diabetes Research Connection

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3