Defining and developing operational psychology competency

Author:

Staal Mark1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. OSS Consulting, LLC Southern Pines USA

Abstract

IntroductionEstablishing competency in new or emerging areas of psychological practice is always difficult. For practitioners of operational psychology, it is even more challenging due to the requirement for highly specialized skills, novel applications, and the fact that many organizations employing operational psychologists operate in classified or sensitive settings. Despite the ethical obligation to do so, operational psychologists may face challenges in establishing and maintaining their credentials and competency.MethodsThis article outlines the core competencies of operational psychology based on the extant literature, provides case examples illustrating their application, and identifies recommendations for training and consultation necessary for establishing and maintaining competence.DiscussionGiven the scarcity of current training opportunities, limited mentorship, and the lack of training standards, many operational psychologists may develop only some, but not all, of their specialty's core competencies. Furthermore, establishing and maintaining competency may take years of post‐graduate study and experience for most practitioners.ResultsTo accelerate this process and codify core competencies and training standards, the formation of an operational psychology society or association may be necessary. Such actions could create a collective agency among practitioners, securing advocacy for the needs and equities of this practice community, and advancing its policies, practices, and scholarship.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference88 articles.

1. Block periodized training improves physiological and tactically relevant performance in Naval Special Warfare operators;Abt J.;Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,2016

2. American Psychological Association. (2015).Resolution to amend the 2006 and 2013 council resolutions to clarify the roles of psychologists related to interrogation and detainee welfare in national security settings to further implement the 2008 petition resolution and to safeguard against acts of torture and cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in all settingshttp://www.apa.org/independent‐review/psychologists‐interrogation.pdf.

3. American Psychological Association. (2017a).Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2010 Adopted January 1 2017)http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.

4. American Psychological Association. (2017b).Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context identity and intersectionalityhttp://www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural‐guidelines.pdf.

5. Professional practice guidelines for occupationally mandated psychological evaluations;American Psychological Association;American Psychologist,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3