Affiliation:
1. Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry University of Washington Seattle Washington USA
2. Kois Center Seattle Washington USA
3. Department of Prosthodontics School of Dental Medicine Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA
4. Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA
5. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland
6. Department of Restorative Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland
7. Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
8. Private Practice Seattle Washington USA
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo report the means to maximize the predictability and accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans through the evaluation of operator and patient‐related factors.Materials and MethodsA search of published articles related to factors that can decrease the scanning accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans was completed in four data sources:MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, and Web of Science. All studies related to variables that can influence the accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans obtained by using intraoral scanners (IOSs) were considered. These variables included ambient lighting, scanning pattern, implant scan body (ISB) design, techniques for splinting ISBs, arch location, implant position, and inter‐implant distance.ResultsAmong operator‐related factors, ambient lighting conditions, scanning pattern, and ISB design (material, geometry, and retention design) can impact the accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans. The optimal ISB for maximizing IOS accuracy is unclear; however, polymer ISB can wear with multiple reuse and sterilization methods. Among patient‐related factors, additional variables should be considered, namely arch (maxillary vs. mandibular arch), implant position in the arch, inter‐implant distance, implant depth, and angulation.ConclusionsAmbient lighting conditions should be established based on the IOS selected to optimize the accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans. The optimal scanning pattern may vary based on the IOS, clinical situation, and the number of implants. The optimal ISB design may vary depending on the IOS used. Metallic implant scan bodies are preferred over polymer ISB designs to minimize wear due to multiple use and sterilization distortion. Among patient‐related factors, additional variables should be considered namely the arch scanned, implant position in the arch, inter‐implant distance, implant depth, and angulation. The impact of these factors may vary depending on the IOS selected.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献