Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy

Author:

Revilla‐León Marta123ORCID,Lanis Alejandro4,Yilmaz Burak567,Kois John C.128ORCID,Gallucci German O.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. Kois Center Seattle Washington USA

3. Department of Prosthodontics School of Dental Medicine Tufts University Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences Harvard School of Dental Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

6. Department of Restorative Preventive and Pediatric Dentistry School of Dental Medicine University of Bern Bern Switzerland

7. Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

8. Private Practice Seattle Washington USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo report the means to maximize the predictability and accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans through the evaluation of operator and patient‐related factors.Materials and MethodsA search of published articles related to factors that can decrease the scanning accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans was completed in four data sources:MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, and Web of Science. All studies related to variables that can influence the accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans obtained by using intraoral scanners (IOSs) were considered. These variables included ambient lighting, scanning pattern, implant scan body (ISB) design, techniques for splinting ISBs, arch location, implant position, and inter‐implant distance.ResultsAmong operator‐related factors, ambient lighting conditions, scanning pattern, and ISB design (material, geometry, and retention design) can impact the accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans. The optimal ISB for maximizing IOS accuracy is unclear; however, polymer ISB can wear with multiple reuse and sterilization methods. Among patient‐related factors, additional variables should be considered, namely arch (maxillary vs. mandibular arch), implant position in the arch, inter‐implant distance, implant depth, and angulation.ConclusionsAmbient lighting conditions should be established based on the IOS selected to optimize the accuracy of intraoral digital implant scans. The optimal scanning pattern may vary based on the IOS, clinical situation, and the number of implants. The optimal ISB design may vary depending on the IOS used. Metallic implant scan bodies are preferred over polymer ISB designs to minimize wear due to multiple use and sterilization distortion. Among patient‐related factors, additional variables should be considered namely the arch scanned, implant position in the arch, inter‐implant distance, implant depth, and angulation. The impact of these factors may vary depending on the IOS selected.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3