Efficacy of parent–child interaction therapy for children born premature

Author:

Matano Miyuki1ORCID,Kurane Koyuru1,Wakabayashi Kei1,Yada Yukari1,Kono Yumi1,Tajima Toshihiro1,Osaka Hitoshi1ORCID,Monden Yukifumi1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke City Tochigi Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPremature children are known to be at a high risk of developing behavioral problems. This study examined the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy (PCIT) in reducing behavioral problems in young children born premature.MethodsThe study included 18 child–parent pairs with children born at less than 35 weeks of gestation (range: 23–34 weeks, median: 31.0 weeks) and aged 27–52 months (median: 38.0 months). They were assigned to either the PCIT group (n = 7) or the non‐PCIT group (n = 11) based on maternal desire for treatment. The study was designed to examine the effects of PCIT. Specifically, the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) intensity score, ECBI problem score, and Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI‐SF) scores were compared before treatment and after 6 months.ResultsIn the PCIT group, the mean ECBI intensity score was 135.7 (SD = 13.5; T‐score = 64) at baseline and 90.1 (SD = 15.5; T‐score = 46) at post‐assessment, the mean ECBI problem score was 9.8 (SD = 1.9; T‐score = 54) at baseline and 4.4 (SD = 3.1; T‐score = 44) at post‐assessment, the mean PSI‐SF total score was 60.1 (SD = 4.8; 95%tile) at baseline and 49.6 (SD = 5.6; 85%tile) at post‐assessment, showing a significant improvement (ECBI intensity scores: p < 0.001, d = 2.03; ECBI problem scores: p < 0.001, d = 1.94; PSI‐SF total scores: p = 0.004, d = 0.86). On the other hand, none of the scores showed significant change in the non‐PCIT group.ConclusionsThe PCIT can be considered as a potential treatment option for behavioral problems in young children born premature.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3