Can group‐based strategies increase community resilience? Longitudinal predictors of sustained participation in Covid‐19 mutual aid and community support groups

Author:

Perach Rotem12ORCID,Fernandes‐Jesus Maria34ORCID,Miranda Daniel5,Mao Guanlan2,Ntontis Evangelos6,Cocking Chris7,McTague Michael8,Semlyen Joanna910,Drury John2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Social Sciences University of Westminster London UK

2. School of Psychology University of Sussex Brighton UK

3. School of Education, Language and Psychology York St John University York UK

4. Faculty of Humanities University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa

5. Centro de Medición MIDE UC Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile

6. School of Psychology and Counselling The Open University Milton Keynes UK

7. School of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences University of Brighton Brighton UK

8. Overton Emergency Group Lancaster UK

9. Norwich Medical School University of East Anglia Norwich UK

10. NR2 Mutual Aid/COVID‐19 Community Response Norwich UK

Abstract

AbstractMutual aid groups have been a critical part of the coronavirus disease‐2019 (Covid‐19) response and continue to address the needs of people in their communities. To understand how mutual aid and similar community support groups can be sustained over time, we test the idea that using group‐based strategies initiates psychological trajectories that shape future participation. We conducted a preregistered longitudinal survey among Covid‐19 mutual aid and community support volunteers in the United Kingdom (nWave 1 = 600, May 2021; nWave 2 = 299, July–August 2021) who were registered panelists of an independent research organization. Assessments included measures of group‐based strategies, collective participation predictors, participation experience, and sustained participation. Volunteers engaged in a wide range of support activities including shopping, emotional support provision, and deliveries. Two group‐based strategies—group alliances and group horizontality—longitudinally predicted sustained participation. In addition, sense of community responsibility and burnout were longitudinal predictors of sustained participation. Importantly, predictors of sustained participation diverged for volunteers with different levels of volunteering experience. Our findings highlight group‐based strategies as a potential resource for organizers seeking to sustain participation. Use can be tailored depending on the profiles of individual Covid‐19 mutual aid volunteers. These findings have significance beyond Covid‐19 as they are relevant to sustaining community resilience more generally.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference71 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3