The use of different intranasal splints Doyle splints versus Reuter bivalve splints versus no splints in primary septal surgeries: A randomised clinical trial looking at morbidity

Author:

Abi Zeid Daou Christophe1ORCID,Zaytoun Georges1ORCID,Hadi Usamah1ORCID,Fakhri Samer12ORCID,Korban Zeina1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon

2. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery University of Texas Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to compare the morbidity of different types of intranasal splints (Doyle splints and Reuter bivalve splints) with no intranasal splints in primary septal surgeries and concomitant submucosal reduction of the inferior turbinate.DesignRandomised clinical trialSettingSingle‐Center trial at a tertiary care facilityParticipantsIn this randomised clinical trial, 123 consecutive patients underwent primary septoplasty with bilateral submucosal reduction of the inferior turbinate, with no other concurrent procedure. Patients were randomised into three groups: Doyle splints, Reuter bivalve splints and patients with no splints placed.Main Outcome MeasuresFollowing surgery, the patients were seen at three consecutive visits. During each visit, the Visual Analogue Scale score for headache, nasal obstruction, overall pain and bleeding and an endoscopic score for secretions, oedema and synechiae was filled.ResultsPatients were randomised into three groups, 42 received Doyle splints, 41 Reuter bivalve splints and 40 had no splints inserted. When comparing the three groups, the first two post‐op visits were scheduled significantly earlier in patients with splints (p < .05). The scores from both groups with splints were statistically higher for headache, nasal obstruction and pain, for the first visit only (p < .05). There was no statistical difference between groups when looking at each subset of the endoscopic score, at each visit (p > .05).ConclusionIncreased post‐operative pain, headaches and nasal obstruction scores were encountered in patients who had splints after surgery. However, endoscopic scores were statistically similar across the three groups with no difference in post‐operative endoscopic scores at each visit. and no difference was seen in symptom scores and endoscopic scores between patients with different splints.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

Reference18 articles.

1. The impact of different nasal packings on postoperative complications

2. Comparative study of intranasal septal splints and nasal packs in patients undergoing nasal septal surgery;Wadhera R;Ear Nose Throat J,2014

3. Is nonabsorbable nasal packing after septoplasty essential? A meta‐analysis

4. Septal splint with wax plates;Nayak DR;J Postgrad Med,1995

5. The role of intranasal splints in the prevention of post-operation nasal adhesions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3