Affiliation:
1. European Commission, Joint Research Centre Seville Spain
2. School of Agriculture & Food Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Abstract
AbstractMost signatories of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement have submitted tariff concession offers, as published on the AfCFTA Secretariat's website. Over a year since the AfCFTA came into effect, it is time to take stock of these submissions and assess the data with respect to members' stances towards fostering intra‐African trade through openness on the one hand and maintaining protection against competing imports and revenues from import tariffs on the other. Combining the offers with corresponding trade and tariff data, we find that there are both significant data gaps and inconsistencies with the AfCFTA's trade liberalisation modalities and the trade classification standard. Constructing two tariff schedules, one which repairs the offers for compliance with the modalities and another that maximises the import tariff revenue retained as a benchmark, the analysis confirms that the modalities require regions to liberalise strongly, but most opt to liberalise even more and earlier than necessary. Stances towards freer trade, however, differ markedly between regions. Deriving a measure of liberalisation stance from the schedules above and associating it with trade, economic and geographic indicators reveals patterns that suggest potential motivations for the stances of some country groups.
Reference32 articles.
1. Abrego L. Amado M. Gursoy T. Nicholls G. P. &Perez‐Saiz H.(2019).The African continental free trade agreement: Welfare gains estimates from a general equilibrium model (IMF working paper No. WP/19/124). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
2. African Union. (2017).Modalities for continental free trade area on tariff negotiations (tech. Rep. Nos. TI/CFTA/AMOT/3/ TIG/MOD/FINAL annex IV). Addis Ababa Ethiopia: African Union.
3. Political Economy of Public Policies: Insights from Distortions to Agricultural and Food Markets
4. Asian Development Bank. (2008).How to design negotiate and implement a free trade agreement in Asia. Mandaluyong City Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
5. Centre d'Études Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales. (2024).BACI version 202401 HS17 (2017‐2022). Centre d'Études Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales Paris France. Retrieved on January 31 2024 fromhttp://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/bdd_modele/bdd_modele_item.asp?id=37