Coerced motherhood behind bars: Public support for abortion access for incarcerated women

Author:

Smith Paula1ORCID,Cullen Francis T.1ORCID,Pickett Justin T.2ORCID,Jonson Cheryl Lero3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Criminal Justice University of Cincinnati Cincinnati Ohio USA

2. School of Criminal Justice University at Albany SUNY, Albany New York USA

3. Department of Criminal Justice Xavier University Cincinnati Ohio USA

Abstract

AbstractResearch SummaryThe U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade has profound implications for the 58,000 incarcerated women who are pregnant. Especially in states that now ban abortion, women in prisons and jails who prefer to terminate their pregnancy will be denied that choice by the government and will be forced to give birth. Based on a July 2023 YouGov survey (N = 800) employing three experiments and measuring attitudes toward inmate abortion and parental aid, the current study examines public opinion on coerced motherhood, focusing on states prohibiting reproductive choice. The results reveal that a majority of the American public favors providing incarcerated women in these states with access to abortion through surgical procedures or medication (pills). Among respondents residing in states banning abortion, more endorse than oppose reproductive rights. Support for abortion is particularly high when the pregnancy is due to rape or poses a risk to a woman's health. Respondents also approve incarcerated mothers receiving parental aid (e.g., baby food, baby clothing, nursery care). Notably, conservative Republicans are most in favor of coercing motherhood and least in favor of providing parental aid.Policy ImplicationsCoerced motherhood behind bars is a human rights violation. Our study shows that it is also opposed by the American public. Thus, ideological space exists for reforms aimed at providing incarcerated women with access to reproductive services. Every correctional facility should be given a written protocol (Model Reproductive Services Code) that mandates pregnancy screenings, counseling, and assistance in scheduling services, as well as transportation for surgery and/or access to pills for a medical abortion. Above all, transparency is needed to raise consciousness about coerced motherhood behind bars and to shed light on how corrections professionals handle inmate pregnancies.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference131 articles.

1. Aaron F.(2022).The unexpected impact of Dobbs on criminal justice: Part II. Interrogating Justice.https://interrogatingjustice.org/uncategorized/fairness‐in‐sentencing/the‐unexpected‐impact‐of‐dobbs‐on‐criminal‐justice‐part‐ii/

2. “Abortion.” (2023).Abortion. Gallup historical trends. Gallup.https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx

3. “Abortion by mail.” (2024).Abortion by mail. AidAccess.https://aidaccess.org/en/

4. Adams C.(2022 June 29).The end of Roe is “horrific” for incarcerated people seeking abortion care.NBC News.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/end‐roe‐horrific‐incarcerated‐people‐seeking‐abortion‐care‐rcna35898

5. American Civil Liberties Union. (1994).Access denied: Origins of the Hyde Amendment and other restrictions on public funding of abortion. ACLU.https://www.aclu.org/documents/access‐denied‐origins‐hyde‐amendment‐and‐other‐restrictions‐public‐funding‐abortion

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3