Mapping of Purkinje‐related ventricular arrhythmias by a multispline catheter with small and close‐paired electrodes: Comparison with conventional catheters

Author:

Takase Susumu12,Mukai Yasushi13,Nagaoka Kazuhiro24,Ogawa Kiyohiro4,Kawai Shunsuke3,Honda Nobuhiro2ORCID,Nagayama Tomomi1,Tohyama Takeshi5,Inoue Shujiro6,Sadamatsu Kenji2,Tashiro Hideki2,Sakamoto Kazuo1,Matoba Tetsuya1,Chishaki Akiko1,Kinugawa Shintaro1,Tsutsui Hiroyuki17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Faculty of Medical Sciences Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

2. Division of Cardiology St Mary's Hospital Kurume Japan

3. Division of Cardiology Fukuoka Red Cross Hospital Fukuoka Japan

4. Division of Cardiology Fukuoka City Hospital Fukuoka Japan

5. Center for Clinical and Translational Research Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan

6. Division of Cardiology Iizuka Hospital Iizuka Japan

7. School of Medicine and Graduate School International University of Health and Welfare Okawa Japan

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPrecise mapping of the Purkinje fiber network is essential in catheter ablation of Purkinje‐related ventricular arrhythmias (PrVAs). We sought to evaluate the mapping ability of a multi‐spline duodecapolar catheter (PentaRay) for PrVAs.MethodsMappings of Purkinje fibers by PentaRay catheters were compared with those by conventional mapping catheters in consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of PrVAs from 2015 to 2022.ResultsSixteen PrVAs (7 premature ventricular contractions or non‐reentrant fascicular tachycardias [PVCs/NRFTs] and 9 fascicular ventricular tachycardias [FVTs]) were retrospectively studied. In PVCs/NRFTs, earliest preceding Purkinje potentials (PPs) could be recorded by the PentaRay catheters but not by the mapping and ablation catheters in 5 cases. At the earliest PP sites, the precedence from the QRS onset was greater, and the amplitude of the preceding potentials was higher in the PentaRay catheter compared with those in the mapping and ablation catheter (−62.0 ± 42.8 vs. −29.4 ± 34.2 ms, P = 0.02; 0.45 ± 0.43 vs. 0.09 ± 0.08 mV, P = 0.02). In FVTs, late diastolic potentials (P1) were recorded by the PentaRay catheters but not by the mapping and ablation catheters or the linear duodecapolar catheter in 2 cases. The amplitude of P1 was higher in the PentaRay catheter compared with that in the linear duodecapolar catheter and the mapping and ablation catheters (0.72 ± 0.49 vs. 0.17 ± 0.18 vs. 0.27 ± 0.21 mV, P = 0.0006, P = 0.002). The localized critical PPs, defined as the earliest preceding potentials in PVCs/NRFTs and P1 in FVTs, could be recorded in all the patients by the PentaRay catheter. The mapping ability of critical PPs of PrVAs was better with the PentaRay catheter than with the conventional mapping catheters (16/16 vs. 9/16, P = 0.004 by McNemar exact test).ConclusionsThe PentaRay catheter has clinical advantages in mapping of the Purkinje fiber network to reveal critical PPs as ablation targets of PrVAs.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3