Patient‐reported outcome measures in adult HIV care: A rapid scoping review of targeted outcomes and instruments used

Author:

Engler Kim1ORCID,Avallone Francesco2ORCID,Cadri Abdul2ORCID,Lebouché Bertrand123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

2. Department of Family Medicine McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

3. Chronic Viral Illness Service, Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University Health Centre Montreal Quebec Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThere is international interest in the integration of patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine HIV care, but little work has synthesized the content of published initiatives. We conducted a rapid scoping review primarily to identify their selected patient‐reported outcomes and respective instruments.MethodsFour databases were searched on 4 May 2022 (Medline, Embase, CINAHL and PsychINFO) for relevant English language documents published from 2005 onwards. Dual review of at least 20% of records, full texts and data extraction was performed. Outcomes and instruments were classified with an adapted 14‐domain taxonomy. Instruments with evidence of validation were described.ResultsOf 13 062 records generated for review, we retained a final sample of 94 documents, referring to 60 distinct initiatives led mostly in the USA (n = 29; 48% of initiatives), Europe (n = 16; 27%) and Africa (n = 9; 15%). The measured patient‐reported outcome domains were: mental health (n = 42; 70%), substance use (n = 23; 38%), self‐management (n = 16; 27%), symptoms (n = 12; 20%), sexual/reproductive health (n = 12; 20%), physical health (n = 9; 15%), treatment (n= 8; 13%), cognition (n = 7; 12%), quality of life (n = 7; 12%), violence/abuse (n = 6; 10%), stigma (n = 6; 10%), socioeconomic issues (n = 5; 8%), social support (n = 3; 5%) and body/facial appearance (n = 1; 2%). Initiatives measured 2.6 outcome domains, on average (range = 1–11). In total, 62 distinct validated PROMs were identified, with 53 initiatives (88%) employing at least one (M = 2.2). Overwhelmingly, the most used instrument was any version of the Patient Health Questionnaire to measure symptoms of depression, employed by over a third (26; 43%) of initiatives.ConclusionPublished PROM initiatives in HIV care have spanned 19 countries and disproportionately target mental health and substance use.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Merck Canada

Publisher

Wiley

Reference200 articles.

1. Consensus statement on the role of health systems in advancing the long-term well-being of people living with HIV

2. Article Commentary: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

3. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Research

4. Routine provision of feedback from patient‐reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice;Gibbons C;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3