Affiliation:
1. University of Winnipeg
Abstract
AbstractWhile athletic competition relies on comparison (the necessary similarity of opponents, rules, conditions of victory), epinician poetry claims superlative fame and similarly singular victors. By addressing all explicit and implicit instances of losers and losing, and by paying close attention to epinician language (particularly boasts and litotes), this article deconstructs the naturalized binary of winner/loser in the poetry of Pindar and Bacchylides. Athletic competition, which is structured around similarity, problematizes the matchless fame of epinican and therefore epinician poetry, paradoxically, must work against the essential elements of the very action (i.e., sporting victory) that it purports to celebrate.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Archaeology,History,Language and Linguistics,Archaeology,Classics
Reference72 articles.
1. ‘Homeric battle narrative and catalogues’;Beye;HSCP,1964
2. Helping Friends and Harming Enemies
3. ‘Pindar on Archilochus and the gluttony of blame’;Brown;JHS,2006
4. ‘Warding off a hailstorm of blood: Pindar on martial elegy’;Brown,2016
5. ‘Winning the Olympics without taking a fall, getting caught in a waistlock, or sitting out a round’;Brunet;ZPE,2010
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献