Appraisal of AI‐generated dermatology literature reviews

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) tools have the potential to revolutionize many facets of medicine and medical sciences research. Numerous AI tools have been developed and are in continuous states of iterative improvement in their functionality.ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the performance of three AI tools: The Literature, Microsoft's Copilot and Google's Gemini in performing literature reviews on a range of dermatology topics.MethodsEach tool was asked to write a literature review on five topics. The topics chosen have recently had peer‐reviewed systematic reviews published. The outputs of each took were graded on their evidence and analysis, conclusions and references on a 5‐point Likert scale by three dermatologists who are working in clinical practice, have completed the UK dermatology postgraduate training examination and are partaking in continued professional development.ResultsAcross all five topics chosen, the literature reviews written by Gemini scored the highest. The mean score for Gemini for each review was 10.53, significantly higher than the mean scores achieved by The Literature (7.73) and Copilot (7.4) (p < 0.001).ConclusionsThis paper shows that AI‐generated literature reviews can provide real‐time summaries of medical literature across a range of dermatology topics, but limitations to their comprehensiveness and accuracy are apparent.