Affiliation:
1. Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden
2. Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Linnaeus University Växjö Sweden
3. Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences Linnaeus University Kalmar Sweden
4. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
5. Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
6. Academic Primary Health Care Center Region Stockholm Stockholm Sweden
7. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Neurobiology Linköping University Linköping Sweden
8. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden
9. Section of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine County Hospital Ryhov Jönköping Sweden
10. Department of Health and Caring Sciences Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Bergen Norway
Abstract
SummaryRestless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder characterised by an urge to move arms and legs, usually associated with discomfort, pain, motor restlessness, and sleep disturbance. An individually adapted treatment is needed but difficult to optimise, which makes shared decision‐making (SDM) important. However, brief validated instruments on how patients with RLS perceive their involvement in treatment decisions are lacking. Therefore, the aim was to validate two instruments, SURE (Sure of myself, Understand information, Risk–benefit ratio, Encouragement, i.e., to assess decisional conflict) and CollaboRATE (brief patient survey focused on SDM, i.e., to assess SDM), in patients with RLS. A cross‐sectional design, including 788 participants with RLS (65% females, mean [SD] age 70.8 [11.4] years) from a national patient organisation for RLS, was used. A postal survey was sent out to collect data regarding weight, height, comorbidities, demographics, and RLS‐related treatment data. The following instruments were included: the SURE, CollaboRATE, Restless Legs Syndrome‐6 Scale, and eHealth Literacy Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch models were used to assess the validity and reliability of the SURE and CollaboRATE. Measurement invariance, unidimensionality, and differential item functioning (DIF) across age, gender, and medication groups were assessed. The SURE and CollaboRATE were both identified as unidimensional instruments with satisfactory internal consistency. No DIF across age and gender was identified, while significant DIF was observed for both the SURE and CollaboRATE regarding medication use categories. However, both the SURE and CollaboRATE are potential instruments to be used in research, but also as reflection tools by healthcare professionals, patients, and students to explore and assess SDM, and support its development in clinical care.
Funder
Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献