Phototherapy for atopic dermatitis: A survey of European practice

Author:

Steyn M.1,Gerbens L. A. A.2,Spuls P. I.2,Mashayekhi S.1,Deleuran M.3ORCID,Barbarot S.4ORCID,Wollenberg A.56ORCID,Ferguson J.1,Ibbotson S.7ORCID,Flohr C.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. St John's Institute for Dermatology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK

2. Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Department of Dermatology Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark

4. Department of Dermatology, CHU Nantes Nantes Université, UMR 1280 PhAN, INRA Nantes France

5. Department of Dermatology and Allergy Augsburg University Hospital Augsburg Germany

6. Department of Dermatology and Allergy Ludwig‐Maximilian University Munich Germany

7. Photobiology Unit, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School University of Dundee Dundee Scotland

8. Unit for Paediatric and Population‐Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPhototherapy is used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Evidence for its efficacy, impact on quality of life, cost‐effectiveness and short‐ and long‐term safety with real‐life usage is weak.ObjectivesWe established a taskforce to examine how phototherapy is currently being used as a treatment for AD across the United Kingdom and Europe to inform our understanding and guide future research into management of patients with AD using UV‐based phototherapies.MethodsAn anonymous electronic multiple‐response survey exploring phototherapy prescribing practices and experience of phototherapy modalities was developed by the study authors and sent to members of phototherapy networks from the United Kingdom and Europe. Responses were received between February and July 2021.ResultsAbout 144 respondents from 27 European countries completed the survey. NBUVB was the most widely used [n = 138 (96%)]. Home‐based NBUVB was available in 8/27 countries (25/144 respondents, 17%). Oral psoralen‐UVA (PUVA) was more widely available than bath PUVA (n = 106, 74% vs. n = 60, 42%) and used mainly in adult patients. 49/144 (34%) of respondents had access to UVA1. Phototherapy would be considered instead of systemic treatment in 96% of adults and 82% of children for NBUVB, versus 40% of adults and 3% of children for PUVA. Starting doses, standard dosing increments, length of treatment courses, lifetime limits for treatments and thresholds for performing annual skin assessments varied between responders.ConclusionsNBUVB was the most widely used phototherapy for AD in adult and paediatric patients, while PUVA and UVA1 were less used. Prescribing practices varied considerably, highlighting the lack of consensus practice in many different aspects of phototherapy for the treatment of AD in children and adults. This indicates that further studies are required to determine optimal phototherapeutic regimens for AD and informs our understanding of parameters that should be included in future high‐quality randomized controlled trials (RCT) of phototherapy.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Dermatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3