Measurement of Psychological Resilience to Support Therapy Interventions for Clients in the Clinical Mental Healthcare Setting: A Scoping Review

Author:

Margetts Judye L.1ORCID,Hazelton Michael12ORCID,Santangelo Peter12ORCID,Yorke Janelle134ORCID,Wilson Rhonda L.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery University of Newcastle Newcastle New South Wales Australia

2. RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. School of Nursing The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Hunghom Hong Kong China SAR

4. University of Manchester Manchester UK

Abstract

ABSTRACTWaves of psychological research over 50 years have resulted in the development of scales to measure psychological resilience. Multiple psychological resilience definitions and factors have emerged during this time, making its measurement complex. The overall aim of the review was to identify and describe developments in the measurement of psychological resilience in the clinical mental healthcare setting. Specific objectives included (1) consideration of the validity and reliability of psychological resilience scales, (2) the effectiveness of the scales in clinical mental healthcare settings and (3) to identify the scope that resilience factors are addressed in the included scales. It provides a timely update regarding psychological resilience measurement tools and considers further developments that may be required. Between 2011 and 2024, databases were searched, and English‐language, peer‐reviewed papers with full text were extracted. Eligible studies were those reporting validated existing resilience measures or the outcomes of new measures for use in clinical mental healthcare settings. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. The review demonstrated that psychological resilience measures require further development, particularly focusing on the utility of measurement tools in clinical mental healthcare settings. In this review, we highlight an existing gap in resilience measurement and underscore the need for a new measure of psychological resilience that can effectively assess individuals' subjective experience of their psychological resilience in clinical mental healthcare settings. The currently available psychological resilience measures included in this review do not directly reflect all the factors that might impact a client's depression or anxiety and warrant further research.

Funder

Australian Government

Publisher

Wiley

Reference60 articles.

1. American Psychological Society.2022.“APA Dictionary of Psychology.”https://dictionary.apa.org/.

2. Resilience, COVID‐19‐Related Stress, Anxiety and Depression During the Pandemic in a Large Population Enriched for Healthcare Providers;Barzilay R.;Translational Psychiatry,2020

3. Psychometric Properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty‐Five Years of Evaluation;Beck A. T.;Clinical Psychology Review,1988

4. Rasch Analysis for Instrument Development: Why, When, and How?;Boone W. J.;CBE Life Sciences Education,2016

5. The Dyadic Communicative Resilience Scale (DCRS): Scale Development, Reliability, and Validity;Chernichky‐Karcher S.;Supportive Care in Cancer,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3