Contraceptive effects on the cervicovaginal microbiome: Recent evidence including randomized trials

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundUntil recently, most data regarding the effects of non‐barrier contraceptives on the mucosal microbiome have derived from observational studies, which are potentially biased due to behavioral confounders that may mask their true biological effects.Method of StudyThis narrative review summarises recent evidence of the effect of contraceptives on the cervicovaginal microbiome, emphasising data obtained through randomized trials.ResultsGood quality data describe that initiation of long‐acting progestin‐only contraceptives, including levonorgestrel (LNG)‐implant and the injectables depot‐medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA‐IM) and norethisterone enanthate (NET‐EN) do not alter the mucosal microbial environment. Likewise, no strong evidence exists that the use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) is associated with alterations of the vaginal microbiome or increased risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Limited data on the effect of intravaginal rings (IVRs) on the mucosal environment exist and show conflicting effects on the vaginal microbiota. Copper intrauterine device (Cu‐IUD) initiation has been associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV) acquisition, including in a randomized trial. LNG‐IUDs may have similar affects but need to be evaluated further.ConclusionDifferent synthetic hormones have divergent effects on the microbiome and therefore novel hormonal methods need to be rigorously evaluated. Furthermore, the addition of antiretrovirals into multipurpose technologies may alter the effects of the hormonal component. There is thus a critical need to improve our understanding of the biological effects of contraceptive hormones and delivery methods with different pharmacokinetic and chemical properties on the mucosal microbiome in rigorous trials, to inform the development of novel contraceptives and improve individual family planning guidance.