Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in oncological patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Kader Mohammed Abdul1,Sainudeen Shan1,Khan Abdul Ahad Ghaffar2,Arora Suraj1,Ronsivalle Vincenzo3,Marrapodi Maria Maddalena4ORCID,Cicciù Marco3,Minervini Giuseppe56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry King Khalid University Abha Abha Saudi Arabia

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery King Khalid University College of Dentistry Abha Saudi Arabia

3. Department of General Surgery and Medical‐Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry University of Catania Catania Italy

4. Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Largo Madonna delle Grazie 1 University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" Naples Italy

5. Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS) Saveetha University Chennai India

6. Multidisciplinary Department of Medical‐Surgical and Dental Specialties University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” Naples Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundObstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) has garnered increasing attention in recent years due to its potential association with cancer. This systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the prevalence of OSAS in cancer patients through a comprehensive analysis of existing literature.MethodsThis systematic review and meta‐analysis, conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, aimed to evaluate the prevalence of OSAS in cancer patients. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed to identify relevant studies published up to September 2021. Eligible studies reporting on the prevalence of OSAS in cancer patients, encompassing various study designs, were included in the analysis. Pooled estimates of the odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using the I2 statistic.ResultsSeventeen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were subsequently included in the review. The prevalence of OSAS in cancer patients was estimated to have an overall OR of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75–0.85). In comparison with non‐cancer patients, cancer patients had a statistically significant greater risk of OSAS, as indicated by the total estimated RR for the prevalence of OSAS in cancer patients, which was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.92). Nonetheless, there was a significant amount of heterogeneity (I2 = 96%) among the studies.ConclusionThe overall data analysed in this review indicates that patients with cancer had far reduced likelihood of developing OSAS than individuals without cancer. However, the significant variation across the included studies highlights the need for additional investigation to fully clarify the complex association between OSAS and cancer incidence. These results emphasise how critical it is to identify OSAS as a possible comorbidity in cancer patients, one that should be taken into account for clinical management and ongoing research.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3