Use of portable single‐lead electrocardiogram device as an alternative for QTc monitoring in critically ill patients

Author:

Rebolledo‐Del Toro Martin12ORCID,Carvajalino‐Galeano Ana Beatriz3,Pinto‐Brito Clarena3,Muñoz‐Velandia Oscar Mauricio24,García‐Peña Ángel Alberto124

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Hospital Universitario San Ignacio Bogota Colombia

2. Department of Internal Medicine Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogota Colombia

3. Department of Medicine Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogota Colombia

4. Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Universitario San Ignacio Bogota Colombia

Abstract

AbstractPurposeAcquired QT prolongation is frequent and leads to a higher mortality rate in critically ill patients. KardiaMobile 1L® (KM1L) is a portable, user‐friendly single lead, mobile alternative to conventional 12‐lead electrocardiogram (12‐L ECG) that could be more readily available, potentially facilitating more frequent QTc assessments in intensive care units (ICU); however, there is currently no evidence to validate this potential use.MethodsWe conducted a prospective diagnostic test study comparing QT interval measurement using KM1L with conventional 12‐L ECG ordered for any reason in patients admitted to an ICU. We compared the mean difference using a paired t‐test, agreement using Bland–Altman analysis, and Lin's concordance coefficient, numerical precision (proportion of QT measurements with <10 ms difference between KM1L and conventional 12‐L ECG), and clinical precision (concordance for adequate discrimination of prolonged QTc).ResultsWe included 114 patients (61.4% men, 60% cardiovascular etiology of hospitalization) with 131 12‐L ECG traces. We found no statistical difference between corrected QT measurements (427 ms vs. 428 ms, p = .308). Lin's concordance coefficient was 0.848 (95% CI 0.801–0.894, p = .001). Clinical precision was excellent in males and substantial in females (Kappa 0.837 and 0.781, respectively). Numerical precision was lower in patients with vasoactive drugs (−13.99 ms), QT‐prolonging drugs (13.84 ms), antiarrhythmic drugs (−12.87 ms), and a heart rate (HR) difference of ≥5 beats per minute (bpm) between devices (−11.26 ms).ConclusionOur study validates the clinical viability of KM1L, a single‐lead mobile ECG device, for identifying prolonged QT intervals in ICU patients. Caution is warranted in patients with certain medical conditions that may affect numerical precision.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference55 articles.

1. AliveCor. (2021).Clinicians | AliveCor.https://clinicians.alivecor.com/

2. AliveCor Inc. (2017).Manual de usuario para KardiaTM de AliveCor®:1–5.

3. AliveCor Inc. (2023).Personal EKG devices by AliveCor.https://store.kardia.com/

4. Risk of COVID-19 in healthcare workers working in intensive care setting

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3