Continuous glucose monitoring metrics and pregnancy outcomes in insulin‐treated diabetes: A post‐hoc analysis of the GlucoMOMS trial

Abstract

AbstractAimTo investigate the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and perinatal outcomes in insulin‐treated diabetes mellitus in pregnancy.Materials and MethodsIn a post‐hoc analysis of the GlucoMOMS randomized controlled trial, we investigated the association between the metrics of an offline, intermittent CGM, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and perinatal outcomes per trimester in different types of diabetes (type 1, 2 or insulin‐treated gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM]). Data were analysed using multivariable binary logistic regression. Outcomes of interest were neonatal hypoglycaemia, pre‐eclampsia, preterm birth, large for gestational age (LGA) and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission. The glucose target range was defined as 3.5–7.8 mmol/L (63–140 mg/dL).ResultsOf the 147 participants (N = 50 type 1 diabetes, N = 94 type 2 diabetes/insulin‐treated GDM) randomized to the CGM group of the GlucoMOMS trial, 115 participants had CGM metrics available and were included in the current study. We found that, in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes, a higher second trimester mean glucose was associated with LGA (odds ratio 2.6 [95% confidence interval 1.1–6.2]). In type 2 and insulin‐treated gestational diabetes, an increased area under the curve above limit was associated with LGA (odds ratio 10.0 [95% confidence interval 1.4–72.8]). None of the CGM metrics were associated with neonatal hypoglycaemia, pre‐eclampsia, shoulder dystocia, preterm birth and NICU admission rates for pregnancies complicated by any type of diabetes.ConclusionIn this study, in type 2 diabetes or insulin‐treated GDM, the glucose increased area under the curve above limit was associated with increased LGA. In type 1 diabetes, the mean glucose was the major determinant of LGA. Our study found no evidence that other CGM metrics determined adverse pregnancy outcomes.