Mechanical aortic valve prostheses offer a survival benefit in 50–65 year olds: AUTHEARTVISIT study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Mechanical aortic valve prostheses offer a survival benefit in 50–65 year olds: AUTHEARTVISIT study

Published:2021-12-30 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0014-2972
Container-title:European Journal of Clinical Investigation
language:en
Short-container-title:Eur J Clin Investigation

Author:

Traxler Denise¹²³^ORCID,Krotka Pavla⁴,Laggner Maria²³,Mildner Michael⁵,Graf Alexandra⁴,Reichardt Berthold⁶,Wendt Ralph⁷,Auer Johann⁸^ORCID,Moser Bernhard³,Mascherbauer Julia⁹¹⁰,Ankersmit Hendrik Jan²³

Affiliation:

1. Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine II Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

2. Laboratory for Cardiac and Thoracic Diagnosis, Regeneration and Applied Immunology Vienna Austria

3. Department of Thoracic Surgery Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

4. Center for Medical Statistics Informatics and Intelligent Systems Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

5. Department of Dermatology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

6. Austrian Social Health Insurance Fund Eisenstadt Austria

7. Department of Infectious Diseases Tropical Medicine, Nephrology and Rheumatology St. Georg Hospital Leipzig Germany

8. Department of Internal Medicine I with Cardiology and Intensive Care St. Josef Hospital Braunau Braunau am Inn Austria

9. Department of Internal Medicine 3 University Hospital St. Poelten St. Poelten Austria

10. Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences Krems an der Donau Austria

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry,Biochemistry,General Medicine

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/eci.13736

Reference29 articles.

1. Prosthetic heart valves: selection of the optimal prosthesis and long‐term management;Pibarot P;Circulation,2009

2. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease;Vahanian A;Eur Heart J,2021

3. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines;Otto CM;Circulation,2021

4. Survival and long‐term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years;Chiang YP;JAMA,2014

5. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity‐matched analysis;McClure RS;J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2014

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Age-Specific Outcomes of Bioprosthetic vs. Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement: Balancing Reoperation Risk with Anticoagulation Burden;Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease;2024-07-18

2. Mechanical Valves: Past, Present, and Future—A Review;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-06-27

3. Selection for transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement and mid-term survival: results of the AUTHEARTVISIT study;European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;2024-06-14

4. Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 to 70 Years;Journal of Chest Surgery;2024-03-13

5. Reply to Spiliopoulos et al.;European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;2024-03-01