Evaluating the efficacy and safety of letermovir compared to valganciclovir for the prevention of human cytomegalovirus disease in adult lung transplant recipients

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundLung transplant recipients are at high risk for severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Off‐label use of letermovir (LET) may avert myelotoxicity associated with valganciclovir (VGCV), but data in lung transplantation are limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of LET prophylaxis among lung transplant recipients.MethodsThis retrospective, matched cohort study included lung transplant recipients who received LET for primary CMV prophylaxis following VGCV intolerance. Patients were matched 1:1 to historical VGCV controls based on age, serostatus group, and time from transplant. The primary outcome was CMV breakthrough within 1 year post‐LET initiation; secondary outcomes included hematologic changes.ResultsA total of 124 lung transplant recipients were included per group (32% CMV mismatch, D+R‐), with LET initiated a median of 9.6 months post‐transplantation. One CMV breakthrough event (0.8%) was observed in the LET group versus four (3.2%) in the VGCV group (p = .370). The median (interquartile range) white blood cell (WBC) count was 3.1 (2.1–5.6) at LET initiation which increased to 5.1 (3.9–7.2) at the end of follow‐up (p <.001). For VGCV controls, WBC was 4.8 (3.4–7.2) at baseline and 5.4 (3.6–7.2) at the end of follow‐up; this difference was not statistically significant (p = .395). Additionally, 98.4% of LET patients experienced ≥1 leukopenia episode in the year prior to LET compared to 71.8% the year after initiation (p <.001). Similar results were observed for neutropenia (48.4% and 17.7%, p <.001).ConclusionLET prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of CMV reactivation and leukopenia recovery. LET may represent a reasonable prophylaxis option for lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate VGCV. image