A systematic assessment of the quality of reporting for platelet transfusion studies-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A systematic assessment of the quality of reporting for platelet transfusion studies

Published:2010-05-24 Issue:10 Volume:50 Page:2135-2144
ISSN:0041-1132
Container-title:Transfusion
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Delaney Meghan,Meyer Erin,Cserti-Gazdewich Christine,Haspel Richard L.,Lin Yulia,Morris Anna,Pavenski Katerina,Dzik Walter H.,Murphy Mike,Slichter Sherrill,Wang Grace,Dumont Larry J.,Heddle Nancy

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Hematology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02691.x/fullpdf

Reference56 articles.

1. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration;Vandenbroucke;Ann Intern Med,2007

2. The relation of blood platelets to hemorrhagic disease: description of a method for determining the bleeding time and coagulation time and report of three cases of hemorrhagic diseases relieved by transfusion;Duke;JAMA,1910

3. Comparing the efficacy and safety of apheresis and whole blood-derived platelet transfusions: a systematic review;Heddle;Transfusion,2008

4. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement;Begg;JAMA,1996

5. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies;Von Elm;Ann Intern Med,2007

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research;BMJ Open;2019-05

2. Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? – A systematic review of reviews: an update;Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare;2018-09

3. Central venous catheter placement in coagulopathic patients: risk factors and incidence of bleeding complications;Transfusion;2017-08-30

4. Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement;PLOS ONE;2017-01-06

5. Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2016-01