Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire scores and postoperative patient‐reported outcomes of patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery: A secondary analysis

Author:

Kinugasa Yuki1ORCID,Ida Mitsuru1ORCID,Kawaguchi Masahiko1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology Nara Medical University Kashihara Japan

Abstract

AimThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of Fried Frailty Phenotype Questionnaire (FFPQ) scores on patient‐reported postoperative outcomes.MethodsThis secondary analysis of a prospective observational study included 230 inpatients aged ≥65 years undergoing elective abdominal cancer surgery. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery‐15 score on postoperative days 2, 4 and 7. The secondary outcomes included disability‐free survival, defined as a 12‐item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 score of <16% at 3 months. The associations of the FFPQ scores, ranging from 0 (robust) to 5 (frailty), with the primary and secondary outcomes were assessed using multiple analysis.ResultsAfter confirming the linearity of the FFPQ score for the outcomes, multiple regression analysis adjusted for prominent factors showed that the FFPQ score was a significant factor influencing the decrease in the Quality of Recovery‐15 score on postoperative day 2 (β = −2.67, 95% confidence interval −5.20, −0.15), 4 (β = −3.54, 95% confidence interval −5.77, −1.30) and 7 (β = −3.70, 95% confidence interval −5.75, −1.65). The adjusted odds ratio of the FFPQ score for disability‐free survival postoperatively was 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.49–0.90).ConclusionsPatients with higher FFPQ scores before elective major abdominal cancer surgery were likely to have lower postoperative Quality of Recovery‐15 scores and poor disability‐free survival. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 464–469.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference27 articles.

1. Frailty: the perioperative and anesthesia challenges of an emerging pandemic

2. PartridgeJ DhesiJ SelwynD.Guideline for perioperative care for people living with frailty undergoing elective and emergency surgery. 1.0. Centre for Perioperative Care 2021. Available from.https://www.bgs.org.uk/sites/default/files/content/attachment/2021-09-28/Guideline%20for%20Perioperative%20Care%20for%20People%20Living%20with%20Frailty%20Undergoing%20Elective%20and%20Emergency%20Surgery.pdf.

3. Facteurs associés à l’incapacité fonctionnelle ou à la mortalité après une chirurgie non cardiaque non urgente : une étude de cohorte prospective

4. Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery

5. Recommendations for Preoperative Management of Frailty from the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3