Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in cardiac amyloidosis. A single center experience

Author:

Pham‐Trung Chinh1ORCID,Veloza‐Urrea Darwin1,Segura‐Domínguez Melodie1,De la Rosa Rojas Yuleisy1,Aguilera‐Agudo Cristina1,García‐Izquierdo Eusebio Alejandro1,García‐Rodríguez Daniel1,Jiménez‐Sánchez Diego1ORCID,Lorente‐Ros Alvaro1,Mingo‐Santos Susana2,Gonzalez‐Lopez Esther3,Domínguez Fernando3,Garcia‐Pavia Pablo34,Toquero‐Ramos Jorge1,Fernández‐Lozano Ignacio1,Castro‐Urda Víctor1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Electrophysiology Unit Cardiology Service. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Madrid Spain

2. Cardiac imaging Unit Cardiology Service. Hospital universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Madrid Spain

3. Heart Failure and Inherited Cardiac Diseases Unit Department of Cardiology Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda IDIPHISA, CIBERCV Madrid Spain

4. Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC) Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundConventional right ventricle (RV) pacemaker stimulation has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA). Left bundle branch area pacing (LABPP) has been suggested as a promising alternative. We sought to assess the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of LABPP in patients with CA.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed echocardiography and pacing parameters and clinical outcomes in 23 consecutive patients with CA and LBBAP implanted from June 2020 to October 2022.ResultsLBBAP was successfully performed in 22 over 23 patients (19 male, 78.6 ± 11.7 years, 20 ATTR, mean LVEF 45.5 ± 16.2%). After the procedure, 9 patients showed Qr pattern and 11 a qR pattern in V1 on ECG. Average procedure time was 67 ± 28 min. After 7.7 ± 5.2 months follow‐up, no procedure‐related complications had occurred. Although, a significant reduction in QRS width (p = .001) was achieved, we did not observe significant changes in LVEF and Nt ProBNP at 6 months of follow‐up. Pacing parameters were stable during follow‐up: LBB capture threshold and R wave amplitude were 1.0 ±  0.5 V and 10.6 ± 6.0 mV versus 0.8 ±  0.1 V, p = .21 and 10.6 ± 5.1 mV (p = .985) at follow up.ConclusionLBBAP is safe and feasible pacing technique for patients with CA. LBBAP is associated with significant narrowing of QRSd without worsening in LVEF and Nt‐proBNP.

Funder

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3