Affiliation:
1. Department of Political Science and International Relations Korea University Seoul South Korea
2. Department of Political Science University of California Berkeley California USA
3. Department of Politics Princeton University Princeton New Jersey USA
Abstract
AbstractHealth and safety standards offer a convenient means by which governments can claim to be protecting the population, even while pursuing more parochial goals. In the realm of international trade, such standards have most often been studied as a means of veiled protectionism. Yet precisely because health and safety standards create ambiguity about their intent, nations may seek to use them for goals that extend well beyond protecting domestic industry. We theorize that governments will, at times, enforce regulations in ways intended to exact political retribution. To show this, we collect original data on import refusals by Chinese border inspectors between 2011 and 2019. Though ostensibly intended to keep dangerous products out of the hands of Chinese consumers, we demonstrate that import refusals have systematically been used by the Chinese government as a way to punish states that act against China's interest.
Reference99 articles.
1. Strategy, economic relations, and the definition of national interests
2. Adachi Aya AlexanderBrown andMax J.Zenglein.2022. “Fasten Your Seatbelts: How to manage China's economic coercion.”Mercator Institute for China Studies.https://www.merics.org/sites/default/files/2023‐02/Merics_ChinaMonitor_EconomicCoercion_EN4.pdf
3. Ahn Jae‐Wan andM. TaylorRhodes.2021. “Examining Pathogen‐Based Import Refusals: Trends and Analysis From 2002 to 2019.”Economic Research Report EIB‐232 U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service.
4. Does Information Break the Political Resource Curse? Experimental Evidence from Mozambique
5. What Drives Import Refusals?