Patient experience of follow‐up after surgery for kidney cancer: a focus group study

Author:

Harrison Hannah1ORCID,Stewart Grant D.2ORCID,Usher‐Smith Juliet A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health and Primary Care University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

2. Department of Surgery University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge UK

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore patient experience of follow‐up care after kidney cancer surgery and to develop recommendations for best practice.MethodsWe conducted two focus groups, including 14 participants with experience of kidney cancer follow‐up after surgery, to elicit patient views on current follow‐up care. Thematic analysis was used to identify unifying themes to describe the patient experience of follow‐up, and the results were then used to develop a set of recommendations for best practice.ResultsWe identified six themes (feelings of abandonment; uncertainty about the plan; anxiety about appointments; variation in care; a need for information; and a need for emotional support) that described current patient experience and areas in which current care could be improved. In particular, while most of the participants felt that their physical needs had been met, many had struggled with unmet emotional needs and a lack of information and resources. This was especially noted in the period immediately following surgery, when feelings of abandonment were common, and around follow‐up scans and routine appointments, which were a source of anxiety. Our participants also described concerns about the lack of consistency between different hospitals and centres around the United Kingdom, with differences in the content and quality of follow‐up care. Based on the results, we developed a list of recommendations to address some of the challenges described through relatively minor changes to the care pathway.ConclusionsWe identified gaps and variability in current follow‐up care after kidney cancer surgery, and have developed a set of recommendations that, if implemented, would improve the follow‐up care experience for these patients.

Funder

Cancer Research UK

Mark Foundation For Cancer Research

Rosetrees Trust

Urology Foundation

Yorkshire Cancer Research

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

Reference20 articles.

1. Increased use of cross‐sectional imaging for follow‐up does not improve post‐recurrence survival of surgically treated initially localized R.C.C.: Results from a European multicenter database (R.E.C.U.R.). Scandinavian;Dabestani S;J Urol,2019

2. The multispeciality approach to the management of localised kidney cancer

3. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

4. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2022 Update

5. Follow-up After Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Evidence Beyond the Guidelines

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3