Affiliation:
1. Department of Transfusion Medicine Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital Guangzhou China
2. Department of Transfusion Medicine Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital Zengcheng Campus Guangzhou China
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesTo develop an automated verification workflow for transfusion compatibility testing (TCT) based on the AUTO10‐A guidelines and blood group serology characteristics and to conduct a simulated validation of the test and subtest results by assessing the appropriateness of the autoverification rules.BackgroundThe accuracy of TCT results is a fundamental prerequisite for ensuring the safety of blood transfusions. However, the verification of these results still requires manual intervention.Materials and MethodsFive autoverification rules and their standards were determined: agglutination intensity, normal results, logical relationships, delta checks and interlaboratory test comparisons. The established categories and standards for the five rules were retrospectively validated using 13 506 samples (requests) that had been manually verified in our laboratory from January 2020 to June 2023.ResultsA total of 66 638 test items were involved in the autoverification, with 3844 items violating the verification rules, resulting in a pass rate of 96.10%. Considering individual test items, four tests had a pass rate of more than 90% in both the test item result table and the test subitem result table. However, there were significant differences in the pass rates between different tests. The same conclusion can be drawn when the unit is requests. The different standards set for the agglutination intensity and the delta check in the ABO typing testing subitems showed significant differences in pass rates.DiscussionThe incorporation of manually verified results into the automated verification simulation indicated that the five rules established in this study have good applicability, and appropriate standards can lead to reasonable pass rates.
Reference31 articles.
1. Review of current transfusion therapy and blood banking practices;Storch EK;Blood Rev,2019
2. Patient safety and blood transfusion: new solutions;Dzik WH;Transfus Med Rev,2003
3. Risk management in blood transfusion compatibility testing: effect appraisal;Xu P;Chin J Hosp Adm,2018
4. Type and screen method and coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: a prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi;Anu KD;Asian J Transfus Sci,2022
5. Development of the laboratory testing methodology for blood transfusion compatibility;Guo W;Chin J Hosp Adm,2012