Evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of fmea analysis (assembly of aircraft tail as-semblies at PJSC VASO)

Author:

Salikov Y. A.1ORCID,Samogorodskaya M. I.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

2. Voronezh State Technical University

Abstract

The problems of improving the quality of technological processes in domestic enterprises due to their high relevance are reflected in numerous publications of both theoretical and practical nature. However, the performance assessment procedures in the standards are schematically not properly spelled out. This makes it difficult in practice to choose evaluation mechanisms and methods. The priority mechanism of improvement of the enterprise's activity in the field of quality is measurement of efficiency and efficiency of the current quality management system. In our opinion, any activity aimed at improving quality should be economically justified at the stage of its planning. The article proposes a mechanism for assessing the cost-effectiveness of using one of the tools of quality management – analysis of the types, consequences and causes of potential consequences of the industrial production process. The purpose of this analysis is to ensure that all process quality requirements with increased risk are met by developing corrective measures to eliminate the occurrence of probable failures. The article provides an example of such a process-specific analysis. The presented mechanism for assessing the economic efficiency of QMS is based on the real financial performance of the enterprise and can be used at domestic industrial enterprises to measure the costs and results of investments in product (work, services) quality management.

Publisher

FSBEI HE Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Reference22 articles.

1. State Standard R ISO 9004: 2001. Quality management systems. Recommendations for improving activities. Moscow, IPK Publishing House of Standards, 2001. 46 p. (in Russian).

2. State Standard R ISO / TO 10014: 2005. Guide to the management of the quality economy. Moscow, Standartinform, 2005. 28 p. (in Russian).

3. State Standard R ISO 10014 – 2008. Guidelines for achieving an economic effect in the quality management system. Moscow, Standartinform, 2009. 26 p. (in Russian).

4. State Standard R 51901.12-2007 (IEC 60812:2006). Risk management. Method for analyzing the types and consequences of failures. Moscow, Standartinform, 2008. 36 p. (in Russian).

5. State Standard R ISO 9001-2015. Quality management systems. Requirements. Moscow, Standartinform, 2015. 24 p. (in Russian).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3