Affiliation:
1. Animal Behaviour Group, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada (e-mail: abbotkr@mcmaster.ca).
Abstract
Bees are at risk of predation from flower-dwelling ambush predators. Since these predators tend to be cryptic, bees trying to mitigate predation risk may need to make use of indirect cues of the predator’s presence. For example, they may use cues of past predation events as indirect cues of current predation risk. I conducted a series of experiments that examined how bumblebees (genus Bombus Latreille, 1802) respond to cues of past predation events. In two field experiments, I found that wild rose (genus Rosa L.) flowers containing a freshly killed bumblebee, or the scent of a freshly killed bumblebee, received fewer bumblebee visits than control flowers. To test the possibility that bumblebees in the first two experiments were avoiding cues of competition risk rather than cues of predation risk, captive-reared bumblebees were given a choice between two artificial flowers — one containing a freeze-killed bumblebee (relatively more similar to a live foraging bee) and the other containing a crush-killed bumblebee (relatively more similar to a bee killed by a predator). Most bumblebees chose the flower containing the freeze-killed bee, supporting the hypothesis that the bumblebees in the first two experiments were attempting to avoid predation.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献