Comparison of fish size spectra obtained from hydroacoustics and gillnets across seven European natural lakes

Author:

Tušer Michal12ORCID,Guillard Jean3ORCID,Rustadbakken Atle4ORCID,Mehner Thomas1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany

2. Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic

3. Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, INRAE, CARRTEL, 74200Thonon-les-Bains, France

4. Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Aas, Norway

Abstract

We conducted a systematic evaluation of the correspondence in fish length data obtained from vertical hydroacoustics and gillnetting across seven European natural lakes differing in abiotic and biotic characteristics. Length data were analyzed as continuous size spectra characterized by their maximum-likelihood estimated exponents b. First, we examined the relationship between size spectra obtained from the two sampling methods. We then examined whether size spectra from the two methods were correlated with lake descriptors separately or in combination. The modeled relationship between the exponents b from the two methods showed that the exponent b from the hydroacoustics was, on average, the same as that from the gillnet sampling in the seven lakes. The exponents b from the hydroacoustics and gillnets, when averaged, were significantly correlated with lake depth, while their differences were significantly correlated with mean air temperature. To conclude, the overall good correspondence between the continuous size distributions obtained by both methods supports the application of vertical hydroacoustics in acquiring size structure of fish communities in lakes, but not in fully replacing the invasive gillnetting. Yet, some specific methodological details require further research.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Aquatic Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference55 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3