Affiliation:
1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600119, India.
2. Department of Automobile Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai 600062, India.
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India.
Abstract
The present study investigates the impact of various combustion chamber geometries in a direct injection engine fueled with diesel–biodiesel–ethanol blends mixed with alumina nano-additives, named as high-performance fuel (HPF). The HPF was subjected to various combustion bowl geometries including standard hemispherical chamber geometry (SG), shallow depth reentrant bowl geometry (CG1), toroidal reentrant chamber geometry (CG2), and toroidal chamber geometry (CG3). Performance results reveal that in comparison with the SG-HPF arrangement, brake thermal efficiency increased by 11.51% and brake-specific energy consumption decreased by 10.37% when using the CG2-HPF arrangement. For emmisions, CG2-HPF reduced carbon monoxide, hydrocarbon, and smoke emissions by 33.53%, 18.35%, and 14.37%, respectively, in comparison with SG-HPF. Regarding combustion, CG2-HPF resulted in a high heat release rate owing to the reentrant chamber profile of CG2 which improves the air–fuel mixture rate, atomization, and evaporation rate, resulting in more efficient combustion, increased cylinder pressure, and increased heat release rate. Thanks to the geometry of the reentrant profile, the turbulent kinetic energy of the fuel mixture is maintained and returned to the combustion zone. Thus, the stagnation of rich mixtures within the combustion zone tend to decrease. Overall, the CG2 geometry was found to be the optimum geometry profile for HPF, based on improved performance and combustion characteristics, as well as reduced exhaust emissions.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing