Medical education dilemma: How can we best accommodate basic sciences in a curriculum for 21st century medical students?

Author:

Ganguly Paul11,Yaqinuddin Ahmed11,Al-Kattan Wael11,Kemahli Sabri11,AlKattan Khaled11

Affiliation:

1. College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Over the years, the medical curriculum has been changed to accommodate a variety of evolving disciplines and an exploding scientific knowledge of the basic sciences to prepare “a competent physician” of the 21st century. Therefore, we must be innovative in our approach of curricular development if we wish to continue to incorporate new basic sciences knowledge in the face of decreasing contact hours to satisfy the buzz word, “integration”. Certainly, the challenges are phenomenal. The question how to best integrate basic sciences, is not easy to answer as the objectives of the courses and outcome vary from one medical school to another and the fact is, one size does not fit all. However, if we believe that basic sciences are the language of medicine and foundation of clinical knowledge, then we must resolve this ongoing dilemma by introducing basic sciences through a better alignment in a given curriculum. The purpose of this review is to evaluate different curricular models for their basic sciences content and address their strengths and weaknesses. In addition, we will introduce a spiral design to integrate basic sciences for senior students. Finally, we will provide some insight as to how learning and retention of basic science content can be sustained.

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Physiology (medical),Pharmacology,General Medicine,Physiology

Reference31 articles.

1. AAMC-HHMI Committee. 2009. Scientific foundations of future physicians. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, D.C.

2. Aretz, H.T. 2015. Medical curriculum: does one size fit all? In Health and disease: curriculum for the 21st century medical students. Edited by P.K. Ganguly. Nova Science Publishers, New York. pp. 41–63.

3. Barrows, H. 1985. How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. Springer Publishing Company, New York.

4. Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning Curricula

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3