Author:
Knapton Richard W.,Krebs John R.
Abstract
In this study we investigated one possible proximate factor underlying year-to-year changes in mean territory size in song sparrows. We tested the hypothesis that birds defend smaller territories if they settle more or less at the same time, than if they settle on territories asynchronously. This idea is supported by some anecdotal field evidence in birds. To carry out the test, we did two types of removal experiments: (a) removing all the territory holders in an area at the same time and (b) removing territory holders one at a time, with 3- to 4-day intervals between each removal. Both types of removal were done in October 1972, coinciding with the fall peak of territorial activity, and in March 1973, coinciding with the spring peak. All the empty territories were rapidly refilled by juveniles that had previously been non-territorial; thus the breeding density of song sparrows is limited by territorial behavior. The replacement males were bird's that had been dominant in winter flocks of juveniles. For the two simultaneous-removal areas, territory size decreased significantly after resettlement, while for the successive-removal and control areas there was no such change. This shows that settlement patterns can influence mean territory size, and may be a proximate mechanism underlying annual fluctuations in size of territories.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Cited by
94 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献