Leaf area duration in natural range and exotic Pinus taeda

Author:

Albaugh Timothy J.12345,Allen H. Lee12345,Stape José Luiz12345,Fox Thomas R.12345,Rubilar Rafael A.12345,Carlson Colleen A.12345,Pezzutti Raul12345

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Box 8008, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8008, USA.

2. Department of Forestry, 228 Cheatham Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.

3. Department of Forest Science, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.

4. SCION, P.O. Box 29237, Christchurch, New Zealand.

5. Bosques del Plata, CMPC, Posadas, Argentina.

Abstract

Exotic Pinus taeda L. plantations may be more productive than native ones. Several hypotheses may explain this difference; however, process models with a light-interception-driving variable cannot test these hypotheses without foliage display first being quantified in native and exotic trees. We quantified leaf area duration in North Carolina, USA (natural), and Gobernador Virasoro, Argentina (exotic), with no additional nutrients and optimum fertilizer treatments. More (60%–100%) foliage was displayed but for a shorter (∼86 fewer days) time per fascicle in the exotics than in the naturals. Study inference was limited, with only one native and one exotic site. However, while the sites were markedly different in soils, climate, resource availability, and genetics, and we observed significant differences in fascicle display and longevity, most fascicles at both sites survived two growing seasons: the one in which they were produced and the subsequent one. This robust finding indicates it would be reasonable to use two growing seasons for fascicle longevity in process modeling to test hypotheses explaining growth differences in native and exotic loblolly. Fertilization had no effect on any exotic tree parameter, but it increased natural tree fascicle number (24%) and length (30%).

Publisher

Canadian Science Publishing

Subject

Ecology,Forestry,Global and Planetary Change

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3