Capacity of piles subject to downdrag: a comparison of North American bridge design codes and observations from a full-scale test pile program

Abstract

Negative skin friction caused by ground settlement is an important consideration for deep foundations in limit states design. However, there are inconsistencies in the methodology whereby negative skin friction and associated drag force are considered in assessing the geotechnical capacity or geotechnical ultimate limit state (ULS) in various design codes. This includes two current North American bridge design codes, the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, and AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. A test pile program was developed to observe effects of ground settlement on pile settlement, capacity, and drag force. Two instrumented steel H-piles were driven through a compressible clay layer to a hard end-bearing stratum, subjected to ground settlement by constructing a 1.5 m high embankment, followed by static load testing. A load-transfer model was calibrated from the test pile program observations. Test results and the calibrated model were used to compare geotechnical ULS requirements of the two bridge design codes. It is demonstrated that drag force did not detrimentally impact pile capacity. The results showed that for conditions of the test pile program, assessing the geotechnical ULS can be more conservative when adhering to the current AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications than the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code.