Affiliation:
1. Department of Horticultural Sciences and Interdisciplinary Program of Molecular and Environmental Plant Sciences (MEPS), College Station, TX 77843-2133, USA.
2. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2117, USA.
Abstract
There are important engineering and crop production advantages in growing plants under hypobaric (reduced atmospheric pressure) conditions for extraterrestrial base or spaceflight environments. The objectives of this research were to determine the influence of hypobaria and reduced partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) (hypoxia) under low and high light irradiance on carbon dioxide (CO2) assimilation (CA), dark-period respiration (DPR), and the CO2 compensation and CO2 saturation points of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. ‘Buttercrunch’). Plants were grown under variable total gas pressures [25 and 101 kPa (ambient)] at 6, 12, or 21 kPa pO2 (approximately the partial pressure in air at normal pressure). Light irradiance at canopy level of the low-pressure plant growth system (LPPG) was at 240 (low) or 600 (high) µmol·m–2·s–1. While hypobaria (25 kPa) had no effect on CA or the CO2 compensation point, it reduced the DPR and the CO2 saturation point, and increased the CA / DPR ratio. Hypoxia (6 kPa pO2) and low light reduced CA, DPR, and the CA / DPR ratio. Hypoxia decreased the CO2 compensation point regardless of total pressure. Hypoxia also decreased the the CO2 saturation point of ambient-pressure plants, but had no effect on hypobaric plants. While low light reduced the CO2 saturation point, it increased the CO2 compensation point, compared with high-light plants. The results show that hypobaric conditions of 25 kPa do not adversely affect gas exchange compared with ambient-pressure plants, and may be advantageous during hypoxic stress.
Publisher
Canadian Science Publishing
Subject
Plant Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference42 articles.
1. Respiration in a future, higher-CO2 world
2. Growth of plants at reduced pressures: Experiments in wheat - technological advantages and constraints
3. Current and potential productivity of wheat for a controlled environment life support system
4. Bugbee, B.G., and Salisbury, F.B. 1989b. Controlled environment crop production: hydroponic vs. lunar regolith. In Lunar base agriculture: soils for plant growth. Edited by D.W. Ming and D.L. Henninger. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisc. pp. 107–129.
5. Burg, S.P. 2004. Postharvest physiology and hypobaric storage of fresh produce. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献