Affiliation:
1. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Abstract
Abstract
Geologic uncertainty usually leads to large uncertainty in the predictions of risk-related system properties and/or risk metrics (e.g., CO2 plumes and CO2/brine leakage rates) at a geologic CO2 storage site. Different type of data, e.g., point measurements from monitoring wells and spatial data from 4D seismic surveys, can be leveraged or assimilated to reduce the risk predictions. In this work, we develop a novel framework for spatial data assimilation and risk forecasting. Under the U.S. Department of Energy's National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP), we have developed a framework using an ensemble-based data assimilation approach called ES-MDA-GEO for spatial data assimilation and forecasting. In particular, we took CO2 saturation maps (can be interpreted from 4D seismic surveys) as inputs for spatial data assimilation. Three seismic surveys at years 1, 3 and 5 were considered in this study. Accordingly, three saturation maps were generated for data assimilation. The impact of level of data noise was also investigated in this work. Our results show increased similarity between the updated reservoir models and the "ground-truth" model with the increased number of seismic surveys. Predictive accuracy in CO2 saturation plume increases with the increased number of seismic surveys as well. We also observed that with the increase of the level of data noise from 1% to 10%, the difference between the updated models and the ground truth does not increase significantly. Similar observation was made for the prediction of CO2 plume distribution at the end of post CO2 injection period by increasing the data noise. Our study results also indicate that comparatively spatial data carry more value than point measurements from monitoring wells to reduce the uncertainty in the risk predictions.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献