EOR vs. Infill Well Drilling: How to Make the Choice?

Author:

Alusta Gamal1,Mackay Eric1,Fennema Julian1,Collins Ian2

Affiliation:

1. Heriot-Watt University

2. BP

Abstract

Abstract It is a common observation that operating companies are reluctant to use EOR techniques when they have the option of infill well drilling instead. Reasons for this include the advances in technology that allow accurate prediction of where unswept reserves are located. Other factors include the quicker recovery of the investment, and the fact that oil companies are well experienced in judging the risk and possible returns associated with drilling wells, whereas quantification of the risk and possible returns from EOR projects is difficult to calculate in advance and to evaluate once in place. However, are the oil companies missing opportunities for maximising return on their investment, and are there limitations in the way in which risk is evaluated which inherently favour infill well drilling? This study involved setting up a range of EOR scenarios, performing reservoir calculations to evaluate additional recovery and then making a comparison with infill drilling to maximise recovery from mature assets. This paper develops an understanding of how the economic comparison should be performed, since the timescales for investment and return on investment and the associated risks and uncertainties are different for EOR projects and infill well drilling. One driver is whether the oil price is relatively high or low. The method involves studying a range of scenarios, selecting appropriate EOR techniques and modelling the impact these techniques have on recovery, and then running calculations of the impact of various options. An economic assessment is made of the costs and risks of the various options together with expected return under a range of economic scenarios. For illustration, a synthetic reservoir simulation model is developed to study the impact of polymer flooding vs. waterflooding. Various uncertainties are tested, and the results are fed into an economic model for an evaluation of sensitivity to various parameters. This was done for polymer flooding, but the approach could be used for other EOR techniques also.

Publisher

SPE

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3