Optimal Stimulation Treatments in Tight Gas Sands

Author:

Holditch Stephen A.1,Tschirhart Nicholas1

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University

Abstract

Why Hydraulic Fracturing Works Hydraulic fracture stimulation can improve the productivity of a well in a tight gas reservoir because a long conductive fracture transforms the flow path natural gas must take to enter the wellbore.Fig. 1a illustrates radial flow in the reservoir when no hydraulic fracture has been created.As can be seen, all of the gas must converge radially to a very small area called the wellbore.For a radial flow pattern, most of the pressure drop in the reservoir occurs near the wellbore. Figs. 1b and 1c show what the flow path of natural gas from the reservoir to the wellbore looks like after a successful fracture stimulation treatment.At early time, Fig. 1b, natural gas enters into the fracture from all points along the fracture in a linear fashion.The highly conductive fracture rapidly transports the gas to the wellbore.At late time, Fig. 1c, the gas in the reservoir is flowing towards an elliptical pressure sink and most of the gas enters near the tip of the fracture.Conventional wisdom in designing hydraulic fracture treatments for tight gas sands would suggest that successful stimulation of tight gas sands requires creating a long, conductive fracture filled with proppant opposite the pay zone interval.This is accomplished by pumping large volumes of proppant at high concentrations into the fracture using fluids that can transport and uniformly distribute proppant deeply into the fracture. As fracture treatment technology has evolved, the trend has been to use more viscous fluids carrying higher concentrations of propping agents to create long, conductive fractures in tight gas sands. In the 1960's, slick water carrying very low concentrations of proppants (around 1 lb/gal) were used in many situations.These treatments were called water fracture treatments[1]. In the early 1970's, more viscous fluids were developed that were capable of carrying 5–6 lbs/gal of propping agents[2]. By 1980, delayed cross-linked polymer fluids were allowing the industry to pump treatments carrying as much as 10–12 lbs/gal of proppant[3].The trend in the industry was to pump more proppant, to create the long, conductive fractures needed to optimize production from tight gas reservoirs. Basic reservoir engineering calculations can be used to show that gas recovery and deliverability will be a function of propped fracture length and fracture conductivity in the reservoir interval. As the hydraulic fracture length and conductivity increase opposite the pay interval, the well will produce more gas at higher flow rates[4].

Publisher

SPE

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3