Understanding the Relationship Between Professional Regulation and Professional Identity in Health Care

Author:

Warren Michael,Braithwaite Christine

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since 2016, the Professional Standards Authority in the United Kingdom (UK) has been building an evidence base to understand the relationship between professional regulation and professional identity of health care professionals. Professional identity can greatly impact the practice of health professionals. To better understand the relationship between professional regulation and professional identity, we conducted a literature review, which gathered definitions of professional identity and analysis of identity among health care professionals. We then commissioned the administration of 16 in-depth interviews with UK health care practitioners to learn their perceptions regarding professional identity and regulation. This paper describes and analyzes the Authority's findings from a policy perspective, suggesting that the professional identity of a health care practitioner is influenced mostly by factors that are local — such as the rapport a practitioner has with a patient, education, mentors, uniforms and external perceptions. These non-regulatory factors take precedence over regulation's influence on the development and maintenance of professional identity. Regulation does appear to have an effect on professional identity when there is a crisis or unusual circumstance (for example removing a professional from practice), but on a daily basis its effects are small, especially compared to other factors.

Publisher

Federation of State Medical Boards

Reference36 articles.

1. Department of Health and Social Care. Promoting Professionalism, Reforming Regulation. www.gov.uk/government/consultations/promoting-professionalism-reforming-regulation. Accessed March 22, 2019.

2. General Medical Council. GMC response to Department of Health (England) consultation: Supporting Professionalism, Reforming Regulation. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/gmc-response-to-department-of-health--england--consultation-supporting-professionalism-refo-73271108.pdf. Accessed March 22, 2019.

3. General Osteopathic Council. GOsC response to Department of Health (England) consultation: Promoting Professionalism, Reforming Regulation. https://www.osteopathy.org.uk/news-and-resources/document-library/consultations/promoting-professionalism-reforming-regulation-gosc-response/. Accessed March 22, 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3