Affiliation:
1. Chazov National Medical Research Center of Cardiology
2. Tver State Medical University
Regional Clinical Hospital of Tver
3. National Medical Research Centre for Therapy and Preventive Medicine
4. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Abstract
Aim. To analyze the frequency, indications, and outcomes of using glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Russia based on data from a multicenter registry.Material and methods. This work is part of the REGION-MI (Russian Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction) multicenter retrospective-prospective observational study, which included patients admitted to hospitals in 45 regions of Russia with a diagnosis of AMI from 2020 to 2023. The decision to prescribe glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was made by physicians. The observation period was 12 months, the following outcomes were recorded: cardiovascular events (relapse/repeated AMI, stent thrombosis, revascularisation), hemorrhagic complications, and in-hospital and all-cause mortality during the entire observation period. The study is conducted on the "Quinta" platform. Statistical data processing was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver.24.Results. A total of 10,884 patients were included in the registry, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were prescribed to 114 patients (1%), all of whom underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while among patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, the frequency of IIb/IIIa inhibitors was 0.5%, among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients — 1.3%. Eptifibatide was used most often (67.5%), tirofiban was prescribed in 28.9% of cases, abciximab — 2.6%, framon — 0.9%. The most common indication for prescribing drugs were complications of PCI, in particular — distal embolism. There was a higher incidence of cardiogenic shock and multivessel revascularization in the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor group. In-hospital mortality and adverse events within 180 days (death, cardiovascular events) did not differ between patients who did and did not receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in this study was associated with an increased risk of all in-hospital bleeding (odds ratio 9.656, confidence interval 2.859-3,894, p <0.001). Other predictors of in-hospital bleeding were: prescription of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, chronic kidney disease with glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, body weight less than 60 kg.Conclusion. We observed a very low frequency of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors usage in Russia, while these drugs are used mainly for complications of PCI in the group of patients with the highest risk — with cardiogenic shock, multivessel revascularisation, and complications of the procedure, which can have impact on the outcomes. Further research is needed to develop an optimal protocol for glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors administration in AMI.
Reference39 articles.
1. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2024;13(1):55-161. DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuad107.
2. Sarkar A, Grigg WS, Lee JJ. TIMI Grade Flow. [Updated 2023 Apr 24]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482412/
3. Kaur G, Baghdasaryan P, Natarajan B, et al. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon. Int J Angiol. 2021;30(1):15-21. DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1725979.
4. Annibali G, Scrocca I, Aranzulla TC, et al. "No-Reflow" Phenomenon: A Contemporary Review. J Clin Med. 2022; 16;11(8):2233. DOI:10.3390/jcm11082233.
5. Gerasimov AM, Tereshchenko AS, Merkulov EV, Samko AN. No-reflow phenomenon in the practice of an endovascular surgeon. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2014;(1):51-5 (In Russ.) DOI:10.20862/0042-4676-2014-0-1-51-55.