Affiliation:
1. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
An important link in maintaining epizootic well-being is a timely diagnosis of an infectious animal disease. In today’s conditions and increased requirements for biosafety, the importance and responsibility of conducting laboratory research is growing. Only a laboratory-confirmed diagnosis is definitive. For the most part, the classic bacteriological method is the basis for an expert opinion and as a result of a laboratory study aimed at identifying the causative agents of bacterial diseases. The relevance of a zoonotic disease is determined by epizootological, epidemiological, ecological, socio-economic values and biosafety for humans and animals. In the article, a thorough analysis and representative results of laboratory studies of biomaterial from different species of animals and data on the dominant and sporadically appearing causative agents of animal bacteriosis in the territory of the Kharkiv region are carried out. The structure of the main causative agents and objects of excretion is determined. Thus, according to the re sults of bacteriological monitoring, it was established that causative agents of colibacteriosis (41%), staphylococcus (30%), streptococcus (17%), salmonellosis (5%), and pasteurellosis (2%) are circulating in the Kharkiv region. The share of causative agents of dysentery, aeromonosis and American bee rot is 1.48% each. The results of the research prove the necessity of continuing bacteriological monitoring for the detection of bacterial pathogens in the territory of the Kharkiv region and the entire territory of Ukraine in order to maintain public and timely prevention of zoonotic diseases.
Key words: bacteriosis, colibacteriosis, salmonellosis, staphylococcus, streptococcus, research, epizootic index, bacteriological monitoring, bacterial diseases, causative agent.
Publisher
The Bila Tserkva National Agrarian University
Reference28 articles.
1. Lavruk, O.V., Lavruk, A.A. (2020). Tvarynnytstvo: stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Animal husbandry: state and prospects of development]. Agroworld, no. 2, pp. 9–15. DOI:10.32702/2306&6792.2020.22.9. (in Ukrainian)
2. Nechyporenko, O.L. (2021). Farmako-toksykolohichna otsinka novykh biotsydiv dlia ratsionalnykh skhem yikh rotatsii za vyrobnytstva bezpechnoi produktsii tvarynnytstva: avtoref. dys. … d-r vet. nauk : 16.00.04, 16.00.03. [Pharmaco-toxicological assessment of new biocides for rational schemes of their rotation for the production of safe livestock products: autoref. thesis ... Dr. Vet. Sciences: 16.00.04, 16.00.03.]. Lviv, 41 p. (in Ukrainian).
3. Korniienko L.M., Korniienko L.Ie., Yarchuk B.M. (2016). Planuvannia veterynarnykh zakhodiv / za red. Korniienko L. M. 2-e vyd., pererob. ta dop. [Planning of veterinary events / edited by Kornienko L. M. 2nd ed., revised. and additional]. Bila Tserkva, 364 p. (in Ukrainian).
4. Pinchuk, N.H., Holovko, A.M., Harkavenko, T.O. (2019). Analiz epizootychnoi sytuatsii shchodo beshykhy svynei na terytorii Ukrainy za 2006–2017 rr. [Analysis of the epizootic situation regarding swine fever in the territory of Ukraine for 2006–2017]. Veterynarna biotekhnolohiia [Veterinary biotechnology]. no. 34, pp. 108–118. DOI:10.31073/vet_biotech34-13 (in Ukrainian).
5. Apatenko, V.M. (1998). Parazytotsenolohiia i problemy parazytotsenoziv [Parasitocenology and problems of parasitocenoses]. Veterynarna medytsyna Ukrainy [Veterinary medicine of Ukraine]. no. 4, pp. 26–27. (in Ukrainian).