The role of electrical impedance tomography in predicting the failure of non-invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19-associated hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational study

Author:

Krasnoshchekova A. P.1ORCID,Yaroshetskiy Andrey I.1ORCID,Serkova T. S.1ORCID,Merzhoeva Z. M.1ORCID,Trushenko N. V.1ORCID,Nuralieva G. S.1ORCID,Tsareva N. A.1ORCID,Avdeev S. N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data on prediction of the failure of non-invasive lung ventilation (NIV) in patients with respiratory failure associated with COVID-19, based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) patterns are limited. OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of non-invasive lung ventilation failure in patients with respiratory insufficiency associated with COVID-19, using electrical impedance tomography data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A monocenter prospective cohort observational study was conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19-associated acute respiratory failure, who underwent NIV in the ICU (n = 43). EIT was used to measure the actual ventilation area (SVENT), hyperinflation area (SHYPER), ventilation delay zone (SRVD), and calculate the proportion of ventilated lungs (AVENT), proportion of hyperinflation area (ZHYPER), proportion of RVD area (ZRVD), as well as the duration of hyperinflation during one respiratory cycle (THYPER), and the ratio of hyperinflation time to inhalation time. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients admitted 15 (10–22) days after the onset of COVID-19. Patients with NIV failure (n = 34) had higher ZHYPER values on the first day (19.5 (16.3–30.5) in the NIV success group and 35.2 (25.0–45.0) in the failure group, AUROC 0.80, p = 0.004, Cut-off 39.7, Se 85 %, Sp 89 %) and the last day (20.6 (10.4–28.5) in the success group and 32.7 (26.4–43.3) in the failure group, AUROC 0.92, p = 0.003, Cut-off 32.7, Se 50 %, Sp 100 %), as well as a higher THYPER/TINSP ratio on the last day of NIV (37.5 (31.0–47.9) in the success group and 65.3 (43.7–88.4) in the failure group, AUROC 0.87, p = 0.001, Cut-off 52.7, Se 71 %, Sp 100 %). AVENT, ZRVD, and inhalation time did not show prognostic significance. CONCLUSIONS: EIT can predict the NIV failure in moderate-to-severe ARDS associated with COVID-19, based on the assessment of alveolar overdistention zones. Further research are needed to investigate this theory.

Publisher

Practical Medicine Publishing House

Reference30 articles.

1. Roesthuis L., van den Berg M., van der Hoeven H. Advanced respiratory monitoring in COVID-19 patients: use less PEEP! Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 230. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02953-z

2. Sella N., Zarantonello F., Andreatta G., et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure titration in COVID-19 acute respiratory failure: electrical impedance tomography vs. PEEP/FiO2 tables. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 540. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-03242-5

3. Yaroshetskiy A.I., Avdeev S.N., Politov M.E., et al. Potential for the lung recruitment and the risk of lung overdistension during 21 days of mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 after noninvasive ventilation failure: the COVID-VENT observational trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022; 22(1): 59. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01600-0

4. Грицан А.И., Авдеев Н.В., Демко И.В. и др. Анализ результатов проведения искусственной вентиляции легких у пациентов с инфекцией COVID-19, осложненной острым респираторным дистресс-синдромом. Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2021; 6: 52–60. DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202106152 [Gritsan A.I., Avdeev N.V., Demko I.V., et al. Results of mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2021;(6): 52–60. DOI: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202106152 (In Russ)]

5. Tsolaki V.S., Zakynthinos G.E, Mantzarlis K.D., et al. Driving Pressure in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Is Associated with Respiratory Distress Duration before Intubation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022; 204(4): 478–81. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202101-0234LE

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3